Last night, President Bill Clinton tried minimizing the effectiveness of the young and inexperienced charge against Barrack Obama.

"...the Republicans said I was too young and too inexperienced to be Commander-in-Chief. Sound familiar?"

Democrats keep saying that George Bush didn't have experience, and neither did Bill Clinton. They are missing the point. They may not have had Washington D.C. experience, but both of them were two term Governors. Both of them had to make tough decisions. You can't say that Barrack has. He couldn't even make a decision on when life begins.

From the Civil Forum at Saddleback Church:

Rick Warren: "At what point does a baby get human rights in your view?"

Barrack Obama: "Well, I think that whether  you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specifity, you know, is above my pay grade."

Are you kidding me? Barrack Obama is not a leader. Plain and simple, you can't be a leader and be that indecisive. The time we are living in requires decisive leadership. If you can't make a decision on when a baby get's human rights, how can you make a decision on when to negotiate with Iran and when to attack, when to stand up to Russia, and when to send troops to war?

Obama can thank Clinton for muddying the inexperienced waters, but Clinton shouldn't claim the republicans were wrong about the "too young and too inexperienced to be Commander-in-Chief." charge. I don't recall him handling the military or terrorism too well.